Skip to main content

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: garthus Date: Sep 7, 2009 8:41pm
Forum: texts Subject: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

Peter,
Yes it is a good idea to post this news when we find it; by caving in I meant they (Google) are giving up some of their booty with they hope that us suckers will pay for it in the future. Well I say a movement should begin which would boycott all of this corporate copyright crap and just concentrate on what we have in the Public Domain. Most of the new stuff is of inferior quality anyway, and I am sure that many of us can spend a lifetime tracking down important documents which are already in the Public Domain and posting them to the Archive.

People who create Art for profit are little more than lower class prostitutes. In fact I give 'real' prostitutes much more respect than the corporate hacks and their lackey so-called artistic creators. At least a 'real' prostitute is providing an honest service without all of the moralistic rantings about intellectual property and such things. The Corporate professionalism of Art is very analogous to the Corporate Professionalism of Education; both with their thoroughly corrupting results. Leading both to crappy art and sub-standard education.

It does not surprise me that the generally well fattened and sub-optimally intelligent humans which increasingly Inhabit Western Societies fall for crap of this sort. What is alarming is that the so-called mavens of Academia fall into place and parrot the party line when it comes to supporting Corporate Copyright Greed. Ditto for our so-called professional librarian class who only seem to squirm when there is talk of some local school district removing some peda-felic text from the school library. Then we hear all sorts of calls objecting to this so-called banning of books; when it is these very same professional librarians whom are rushing to fill the worlds dumpsters with any form of book which they deem to be useless.
The Irony is pathetic if not so loathsome. Such filling of dumpsters with the world's knowledge would have made the loyal Nazi proud during his day. Just like the wholesale slaughtering of civilians by Amerikan troops, people whose only crime is being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Google's tactics are no different and our Professional Librarians actions concerning the destruction of our heritage is also the same. People who apparently only have passion (pathetically speaking) for one thing; THEIR PAY-CHECK.

They all must be exposed for the morally and intellectually corrupt individuals which they are. Hopefully one day a new breed of intellectual will spring forth, individuals who actually value intellect and have a real passion for knowledge; people who refuse to accept the Corporate party line that the main purpose of art is to return 'billions' in profits.

Gerry

This post was modified by garthus on 2009-09-08 03:41:44

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Time Traveller Date: Sep 7, 2009 9:42pm
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

its up to our side to keep up the momentum, as per keep up the counter attacks, Google keeps backtracking, until it realises its a lost cause, but allow Google to have the initiative too much, we will be back tracking.

I dont know how long those news items are available, putting the full text here, i would be breaching copyright, the advertising on the news sites, pay for the news to be collected and distributed.

I wonder if there is a website for opposition to Google?

As for news, I post around 25 items per day, all sorts of topics, to local relevant networks, and I send several items per day to local contacts, some whom provide me with disability service far beyond their normal service, at no extra cost.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicolada Date: Sep 8, 2009 2:58pm
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

"People who create Art for profit are little more than lower class prostitutes."

Thank you! I've felt this way for some time, and I've been making films since 1970. (I was an "indie" before the term became trendy and cool.) Some of us do what we do simply for fun or art or personal expression, not for the almightly dollar. Having made a hundred short films over four decades, I'm working now to make my first feature-length film soon (likely my last film, too), and everyone I ask to help starts by asking about the budget and how I plan to market the film once completed. Market it? Hell, I plan to burn as many copies as I can and give them away for free to family and friends and interested strangers, that is how I plan to "market" my film! Everyone is so bottom-line hungry. Shallowness, ego, and the hunger for money and power seem to rule, these days more than ever.

Sorry if my post is OT, but I wanted to echo my similar feelings about your line that I cut-and-pasted above.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: garthus Date: Sep 8, 2009 3:44pm
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

cosmicolada,

Thank you, it is good to see that there still is some sanity out there when everthing today seems to have a price.

Gerry

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Time Traveller Date: Sep 9, 2009 12:02am
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

When I was well, I designed and made wooden toys, which I sold on a web site, my friends liked the idea that I used my profits to make more toys to donate to charity.

Professional people thought I was nuts, but if I had to make a living that way, I would have had the stress of deadlines, all the compliance paperwork, tax, insurance etc, and no longer enjoy my hobby.

It would just become hard work, and no longer fun. And one day, my designs will be here on the IA, they have already been copied from photos, and cheapened so not as good as mine.

Peter (and I am working towards a limited comeback)

This post was modified by Time Traveller on 2009-09-09 07:02:11

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicolada Date: Sep 9, 2009 12:26am
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

I think I understand. One of the things that has made me reluctant to upload any of my films to the IA or services like YouTube or Vimeo is the likelihood of someone copying and re-editing my films, altering the titles, images or sounds, making "mashups" as I've seen these things called. So I limit myself to burning DVDs of my films for people I know. In the 70s and 80s, it was a matter of running my films through a projector in an auditorium or classroom, which also made copying or tinkering virtually impossible. Not that I think my material is so great, but I just don't want to see my personal efforts f-ed with.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Time Traveller Date: Sep 9, 2009 3:49am
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

Don't forget, it is very wise to get written signed permission from every person whose face shows in your video, before you distribute a video.

Just getting a verbal okay, is not good, because they can change their mind after the video is shown, and say either they never agreed to anything, or you misunderstood them, or you misinformed them.

BTW, my face, is copyright, and before you can use my face in any work of art, you need my permission, and depending on usage of my face, I might expect a payment.

Think about Google Street Map cams, showing identifiable faces, eg, the person might not want people or police to know he/she was in that city.

Copyright, is a legal mine field, and as I have said in my writing's, the only winners in a copyright dispute are lawyers being paid on an hourly basis.

Amazing, 10 minutes ago, here in NZ, on a small network, I posted advice about copyright. If you got no money, you can not protect your copyright, however, the IA, rather than argue, will take anything off, the second they are advised there is a copyright dispute.

http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=publisher%3A%22Time%20Traveller%22

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmicolada Date: Sep 9, 2009 9:31am
Forum: texts Subject: Re: The Corporate Copyright and Intellectual Property Prostitution:

Oh, I know. Getting releases is one of the first things I learned in 1970, and it was reinforced in film school a few years later.